
I didn't grow up reading comic books. I did all of the other normal growing up things: collecting baseball cards (what an investment), playing countless hours of Nintendo (we didn't have your so-called "Game Boxes" and "X-Cubes" back then), stealing my dad's Playboys, and - my personal favorite - gallivanting around the neighborhood with nothing but a stick. It's a wonder, then, that I am such a fan of this particular movie genre.
Among my friends, the feeling is the same. Movies have brought the comic universe into the mainstream, introducing hosts of younger and older generations to the worlds of Professor X and Wolverine. This is where I should and would apologize to the fanboys for stealing what belongs to them, but alas, I must come to terms: I've turned into a fanboy myself. In some ways, haven't we all? Who doesn't want to be a superhero? Who among you Peter Parkers out there doesn't want to score a date with Mary Jane?
As I posted yesterday morning, Fox aired the new X-Men: The Last Stand trailer during Monday night's episode of 24. Of course, as any Galactus-fearing fanboy would, I felt a tinge of excitement as Ian McKellan came on screen, sporting full Magneto gear sans helmet, telling an audience of mutants that the humans would draw first blood. The trailer drew me in from there, showing random flashes of possible brilliance on its way to setting up what hopes to be an epic third and perhaps final installment to the series. But as you might be able to tell, I'm skeptical. Why?
Of the thirty movies that have been released in the past five years, only ten have been quality, ones that I would not mind sitting through a second, third, and fourth time. So it's here, on Newsvine, that I will make my plea to movie studio executives, producers, and directors of comic book films.
Nothing good ever came out of rushing a movie, let alone one that is likely to be full of action scenes and special effects. The masses don't mind waiting for a good movie.
Okay, so I don't exactly know the source material, but I do know that there's an enormous amount of history involved with all of these characters.
Good example: Christian Bale. Bad example: Ben Affleck.
It's true, we like it. Show a shot of Brandon Routh slowly turning his head to reveal the Superman curl, cut to the new Superman logo, and thousands of us will have to change our underwear.
Ten out of thirty is not bad for movies, but the potential is so much more. For every Batman Begins there is an Elektra and The Punisher. Currently, there are thirty-five movies slated for production or release over the next 3 years. Over-saturation of the market with poor quality films might end up killing it, thereby killing all of my chances to ever be called Tiger.
Yeah, honestly, I was reluctant to watch "Batman Begins" after the last few crap Batman movies, and I was pleasantly surprised. I also liked "Hellboy" because of the characters. Let's hope there will be more quality comic book-based movies.
I thought batman begins was better than the last few batmans, but "good movie" is a label I'm not ready to put on it.
Where's the list of the 30? Seems like an oddly round number. Did you include the ones that many people may not realize were based on comics, like "Road to Perdition"?
A few more like Elektra, Daredevil and The Hulk and the comic movie fad will be over.
I enjoyed the Hulk, as it was a little deeper than your traditional comic book movie.
I also enjoyed the Hulk. However, the Elektra and Daredevil fiasco .. omg.. how such drivel ever made it to the screen boggles my mind.
While many properties are helmed by the right people who want to see a quality adaptation, many graphic novel film translations are made for the very reasonable act of drawing in audiences. With popular characters and stories, it's very difficult to balance pleasing the investors and their wallets while pleasing the fans of the genre.
The newest Batman did it well (concaf, are you mad? Comic or not, that movie was awesome! ;)), along with all the Spider-Man movies. Lesser known properties need hooks and flash to bring in people who are otherwise not fans and this is one of the points where disappointment would set in for fans.
reverie: epileptic direction, melodramatic acting, and christian bale has girl lips. :P
*which would be ok, if it wasn't batman, who's entire head is covered EXCEPT for the mouth.
Does your tally include Alan Moore? He wrote "From Hell", The league of Extraordinary Gentlemen", and the soon to be released (if not already out) "V- for Vendetta".
Interestingly enough, his best comic (IMHO), "Watchmen" has not yet been made into a film. While it would be difficult, if done right, it would make a fantastic film. I know Terry Gilliam was interested, but if I remember correctly, he thought he wasn't up to the job...
Neil, it'd probably be worth marking up the list to indicate movies that were really bad. I more or less agree on the goods, but there should be a line between Constantine, which was just kind of meh, and Catwoman, which was like being stabbed in the eye.
Does Unbreakable count?
Looking forward to V for Vendetta. Aeon Flux should have been a lot better, and Batman Begins rules.
Comics and other graphic novels are great sources for movies, but producers should also look into the depth of the actual comic series or novel. Character development, a very interesting plot and a twisted ending are always a plus.
Haaahaha Catwoman. Oh my god.
Um, you have a picture of Superman for the article, but somehow managed skip over that particular movie/series of movies in your list.
Don't forget other fantastic flops like Rollerball
I would love to see things like Battle Angel Alita that would be made.
Just some more thoughts from an avid comic book fan who doesn't have enough time to watch more movies.
Sometimes a "good" movie is in the eye of the beholder. For instance, I would say that Hellboy was a better movie than Sin City. No joke, I would. Hellboy was pretty solidly entertaining while Sin City seemed to just plod and drag its way through. Yes, I know that Hulk was also a plodding and slow movie - but that movie had a much deeper underpinning to it than just "HULK SMASH!" Still, Sin City was a better film (to me) than, say Daredevil - which itself probably isn't as bad as Elektra (which I haven't decided to torture myself by watching yet).
I do agree that there are obviously films that someone took a lot of time on and that sometimes the results are quite good. And then, there's Catwoman.
The Spiderman and X-Men films definitely fall into the former category. However, that doesn't always guarantee a good movie. I also happen to think Batman Begins plodded through, cheated the viewer with horrible fight scene direction, and allowed yet another secretive super hero to give up his identity much too easily (kudos to the Spiderman people for keeping that reveal until the second movie).
Alright, I now feel like I have met my geek quota for the month.
(ps: Josie and The Pussycats is a movie you watch and enjoy and never admit to either)
American Splendor seems slightly debatable as it seems to be more about a man who "writes" comics than a movie about one of his comics. (Though I suppose you could argue that it's about "all" of his comics.) Also, they did "make" a comic out of the movie.)
Neil: I suppose I am guilty of never having read Sin City. In fact, I haven't read any comics, er - graphic novels, since the price went above one dollar. The other thing I should say (that I didn't quite make clear above) is that I didn't dislike Sin City. It's just not something I would watch more than once or twice. As for fight scenes, I like to see well choreographed fight scenes - which means the occasional long shot. Oh well, I suppose since I don't make movies I better just like what I get!
I'm surprised no one mentioned Smallville, which is 95% WB drivel and 5% absolute brilliance.
Does anyone remember the glut of Marvel-based shows from the 70s? (God, I'm old) There was the Hulk (body-builder in green paint), Spiderman (guy in baggy suit with cheesy ropes shooting from his wrists) and Dr. Strange (I have no words for this debacle). I for one am glad I lived long enough for the technology to come into existence which would bring my old faves onto the screen and do them justice. Catwoman blew, though. Time for my Metamucil now.
Oh, and will they EVER do "The Dark Knight Returns"??!!
Haven't seen V-for Vendetta yet, but I saw the advertisement for the film in the NY Times yesterday. Not a single mention of Alan Moore.
It simply said - From the Graphic novel illustrated by David Lloyd and produced by DC Comics... Wtf - no mention of the guy who wrote it!
Did Alan Moore ask to have his name removed from the credits, so as to distance himself from the film? Doesn't bode well. Has anyone seen it yet?
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |